My main gripes with rescript (constructive criticism)

thank you for your thoughtful reply

2. we all have different ways to model or approach problems. i tend to agree with you, i don’t want us to get rid for resi files, but again, usually we only need opaque type t and nothing more, and a resi file for each res file in a projects with ~200 res files would suck to put it mildly.

3. great to hear. interesting point re. ai!

4. i understand that, i still had to get it off my chest

5. tsnobip addresses tihs as well, good to see that there’s still a way to do it!

6. i’ll gladly contribute code once i can get my head around github again, i stopped using it 10 years ago and generally dislike it, but i’ll look into it. do you generally accept PRs if they make sense or do you want to see RFCs first?

7. yes, my point is that rescript won’t infer type parameters of return types (i think)

thanks